But what the ex-Vice Chancellor Steger, member of the ORF Foundation Council, and the incumbent Vice Chancellor Strache deduce from this is, in addition to a party-political conspiracy theory, which I am not entitled to comment on, nothing more than the call to destroy professional livelihoods, so to speak a professional ban on the ORF . “

“Errors may have occurred in the reporting, and these are also extremely regrettable,” said Moser. “But what the ex-Vice-Chancellor Steger, member of the ORF Foundation Council, and the incumbent Vice-Chancellor Strache deduce from this is, in addition to a party-political conspiracy theory, which I am not entitled to comment on, nothing more than the call to destroy professional livelihoods, so to speak a professional ban on the ORF to pronounce. “

The fact that the FPÖ is now vehemently calling for an end to the ORF “compulsory fees” is nothing other than the desire to “break up public service broadcasting in Austria,” continued Moser. “All in all, this is an understanding of press freedom and media policy as we know it from other, cautiously, authoritarian-ruled countries. And unfortunately these are not that far removed from Austria.”

“If there are misconduct, there must be consequences”

Finally, the head of the central operations criticized “the fact that the coalition partner ÖVP is wrapped in eloquent silence and obviously leaves the field to the FPÖ alone”. Media Minister Gernot Blümel (ÖVP) was not available for the APA on Tuesday for a statement. In some newspapers on Wednesday he was quoted as calling for an “objectification” that the “emotions should be turned down”. He described the ORF Tirol contribution in the “Kronen Zeitung” as a “serious mistake”, in “Austria” he declared: “If there are misconduct, there must be consequences.”

Kurz calls for “factual debate”

Federal Chancellor Sebastian Kurz (ÖVP) called for restraint in view of the FPÖ’s attacks on ORF on Wednesday. “Basically, I would like you to try to take out some emotion again,” Kurz said during an appearance with Strache in front of the Council of Ministers. Strache himself justified his attacks on the station again with annoyance at “manipulative” reports.

»See the cause in a very differentiated way«

When asked about the liberal attacks on the public broadcaster, Kurz emphasized that the cause had to be “viewed very differently”. A very problematic incident took place in Tyrol, “which must not be allowed to happen”. The ORF also apologized for this, Kurz referred to the misleading report on an election campaign appearance by the Tyrolean FP top candidate Markus Abwerzger.

Basically, however, the debate about the ORF must be conducted “in a factual manner, without unnecessary emotions,” said Kurz, referring to the planned “media question”. Because of course there is the right to impartial reporting by the ORF, but at the same time the media are rightly entitled to an objective discussion about it.https://123helpme.me/

Strache described his Facebook posting on Tuesday, in which he accused ORF of spreading lies and propaganda, again as excessive satire. “If you will, that was my contribution to Shrove Tuesday,” said Strache. But there is also a real core, the FP boss criticized the ORF reporting in recent weeks. In particular, the “manipulative” report on the Tyrolean FPÖ election campaign was suitable to endanger the local FP top candidate Markus Abwerzger. “It is understandable that there was rightly an upset,” said Strache.

Read news for free for 1 month now! * * The test ends automatically.

More on this ▶

NEWS FROM THE NETWORK

Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at)

New access (yachtrevue.at)

8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at)

Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto.at)

In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (Trend.at)

The 35 best family series to laugh and feel good (tv-media.at)

E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Comments

register

Connect with Facebook

bucaka Wed., Feb. 14, 2018 13:19

Report

reply

YES YES THE WORKS COUNCIL ???? WHAT DOES THE WORKS COUNCIL EARN ON ORF ???? HE WILL BUT BUT HIS OWN GOLDESEL, OR ??? ONCE THE WORKS COUNCIL LEAVED LATER THAN THE UNION HAD FAILED TO KEEP ITS PROMISES FOR OLDER EMPLOYEES !!!!!!!

Page 1 of 1 ”

Three at once

Referendum

ended yesterday. The

“Don’t smoke” popular appeal

Although it did not quite find the 900,000 supporters hoped for, it still made it into the top ten of the strongest popular initiatives since 1945. But what does that mean? And what have been the most successful referendums to date?

First of all, in order to explore the will of the people apart from elections, there are three instruments of direct democracy: the referendum, the referendum and the referendum. There are frequent referendums, but they usually have no consequences. There have only been two binding referendums so far, and a nationwide referendum only once.

Usually ends in the drawer

Referendums are a way for citizens, groups or parties to submit a wish to a law. If there are more than 100,000 signatures, referendums must be dealt with in the National Council. After that, however, they usually end up in the drawer without consequences, because they are not binding. It was the same in 1982, when the referendum against the Vienna Conference Center (Austria Center Vienna) signed by 1.4 million Austrians or 25 percent of the electorate was the most successful of the Second Republic, but the conference center was built nonetheless.

Effects

The deadline solution also applies to this day, although their opponents were able to mobilize almost 900,000 Austrians (17.93 percent) in 1975 – and thus came in third. The second most successful initiative, the anti-genetic engineering referendum signed by 1.2 million (21.23 percent) in 1997, had more impact.

The failed

By the way, four popular petitions have failed to pass the 100,000 signature hurdle: the petition against church privileges with 56,673 signatures (0.89 percent), the “Democracy Now” initiated by former politicians like Erhard Busek (ÖVP) and Johannes Voggenhuber (Greens) – Initiative with 69,740 (1.10 percent) – both in 2013 -, “Pro Motorrad” in 1995 with 75,525 signatures (1.31 percent) and “Raus aus Euratom” of the environmental group “Atomstopp Oberösterreich” in 2011 with 98,698 ( 1.56).

The topics

Incidentally, the majority of the referendums concerned purely domestic Austrian issues – but at least six tried to prevent Austria or the euro from joining the EEA or the EU or to achieve exit. There were also six initiatives on the subject of nuclear power.

The most successful referendums since 1945

(Rank – Year – Title – Votes – Percent)

  1. 1982 – Against construction of conference center – 1,361,562 votes (25.74 percent)
  2. 1997 – Against genetic engineering – 1,225,790 (21.23 percent)
  3. 1975 – cancellation of the time limit solution – 895,665 (17.93 percent)
  4. 1969 – For a 40-hour week – 889,659 (17.74 percent)
  5. 1964 – For ORF reform – 832,353 (17.27 percent)
  6. 2002 – Veto against Temelin – 914,973 (15.53 percent)
  7. 2018 – Don’t smoke – 881,569 (13.8 percent)
  8. 2002 – Welfare State Austria – 717,102 (12.20 percent)
  9. 1997 – Women’s referendum – 644,665 (11.17 percent)
  10. 2002 – Anti-Interceptors – 624,807 (10.65 percent)
  11. 2004 – pensions referendum – 627,559 (10.53 percent)
  12. 1980 – For Zwentendorf – 421,282 (8.04 percent)
  13. 1996 – For the Federal Animal Welfare Act – 459.096 (7.96 percent)
  14. 2018 – Women’s referendum – 481,906 (7.6 percent)
  15. 1993 – Referendum for foreigners – 416,531 (7.35 percent)
  16. 1969 – Around 13th grade – 339,407 (6.77 percent)
  17. 1985 – Against Hainburg power plant – 353,906 (6.55 percent)
  18. 1996 – To maintain neutrality – 358,156 (6.21 percent)
  19. 2011 – Education Initiative – 383,820 (6.07 percent)
  20. 2018 – Against ORF fees – 320,239 (5 ​​percent)
  21. 1987 – Anti-Privilege – 250,697 (4.57 percent)
  22. 1986 – Anti-Draken (Styria only) – 244,254 (4.50 percent)
  23. 1997 – For Schilling referendum – 253,949 (4.43 percent)
  24. 1997 – For nuclear-free Austria – 248,787 (4.34 percent)
  25. 2006 – Against EU reform treaty – 258,281 (4.28 percent)
  26. 2015 – EU exit – 261,056 (4.12 percent)
  27. 1989 – For lowering the number of schoolchildren – 219,127 (3.93 percent)
  28. 1985 – For extension of community service – 196,376 (3.63 percent)
  29. 2000 – Anti-EU referendum – 193,901 (3.35 percent)
  30. 1999 – Family referendum – 183,154 (3.17 percent)
  31. 2001 – Education and Tuition – 173,594 (2.98 percent)
  32. 1980 – Against Zwentendorf – 147,016 (2.80 percent)
  33. 1991 – For referendum EEA agreement – 126,834 (2.25 percent)
  34. 2009 – Against Post Office Closures – 140,622 (2.23 percent)
  35. 1985 – Against Interceptors – 121,182 (2.23 percent)
  36. 2003 – Nuclear Free Europe – 131,772 (2.23 percent)
  37. 1989 – Against ORF monopoly – 109,197 (1.95 percent)
  38. 2011 – Out of Euratom – 98,698 (1.56 percent)
  39. 1995 – Per motorcycle – 75,525 (1.31 percent)
  40. 2013 – Democracy Now – 69,740 (1.10 percent)
  41. 2013 – Against church privileges – 56,673 (0.89 percent)

Read news for free for 1 month now! * * The test ends automatically.

More on this ▶

NEWS FROM THE NETWORK

Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at)

New access (yachtrevue.at)

8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at)

Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto.at)

In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (Trend.at)

The 35 best family series to laugh and feel good (tv-media.at)

E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

The registration week for the

“Don’t smoke” popular initiative

. In the declaration of support phase, 591,146 signatures were collected for a smoking ban in gastronomy, which have already been counted.

For these participants the motto is: “Everyone motivates someone who is still undecided,” said the President of the Medical Association, Thomas Szekeres, at a press conference in Vienna on Tuesday.

900,000 votes “an important goal”

“We have no lower limit, and I don’t think that can be determined in numbers,” said Szekeres when asked whether around 1.2 million signatures are the goal if each supporter is to get one more person to sign. “But there is a number that was named by the Vice Chancellor, that is 900,000 signatures,” explained the President of the Medical Association. Heinz-Christian Strache (FPÖ) agreed to stand for a referendum with 900,000 or more signatures. This number is therefore “certainly an important goal,” said Szekeres.

The initiators of the Vienna Medical Association and Austrian Cancer Aid see a tailwind for the referendum in a current, representative survey that they commissioned the consulting firm Pitters Trendexpert to do. According to this, 62 percent of the 1,092 respondents aged 16 and over spoke in favor of a comprehensive one

Non-smoking protection in gastronomy

out. “32 percent of the citizens who have not yet been declared intend to sign the referendum in the registration week, another 16 percent of them are still undecided,” explained Szekeres. A little more than a third of those questioned want to get other people to sign the referendum.

»Only a general smoking ban can effectively protect our youth from the damage caused by passive smoke in the catering industry«

The government is making efforts to protect minors, but these are “not sufficient,” said Szekeres. “Only a general smoking ban can effectively protect our youth from the damage caused by passive smoke in the catering trade.” According to studies, the number of dangerous microparticles in the air is also significantly increased in separate non-smoking areas of restaurants, emphasized the Graz MedUni Rector Hellmut Samonigg.

Measures such as the smoking ban in schools or with children in the car, the release of cigarette purchases only from the age of 18 or work restrictions for apprentices in the catering industry are difficult to control and inadequate. “It’s like believing you can put out a burning high-rise building with a watering can,” said Samonigg. Every day in Austria an average of 2.8 people die as a result of passive smoking, stressed cancer aid president Paul Sevelda. Since the planned smoking ban was withdrawn on May 1, 2018, 374 people have died from passive smoking.

At the beginning of this week, a new information and advertising campaign for the referendum was started. At the Vienna Night Run on September 25, around 100 prominent active and former top athletes support a “Don’t smoke” team – including footballers from the Vienna Sports Club, handball players from West Vienna, middleweight boxer Marcos Nader, ex-European swimming champion Maxim Podoprigora and the former Soccer players Martin Hiden, Michael Hatz and Roman Stary.

“I believe that politics can be changed if there is very broad popular support.”

“I believe that politics can be changed if there is very broad popular support,” said Szekeres. The campaign runs up to the registration week, if necessary beyond that. “The ban on smoking in restaurants will come, it’s just a matter of time. Our goal is to keep this time as short as possible,” said Cancer Aid President Sevelda.

The referendum runs from October 1st to 8th. In addition to the municipal and district offices, there will be other registration offices in some cities. Support via mobile phone signature is also possible.

For months, News has been campaigning for the absolute ban on smoking in restaurants with a focus on topics. In a joint declaration, all the editors-in-chief of the News publishing group are now calling on the federal government to enforce this smoking ban. Read the statement

here

.

Read news for free for 1 month now! * * The test ends automatically.

More on this ▶

NEWS FROM THE NETWORK

Win true wireless earphones from JBL now! (E-media.at)

New access (yachtrevue.at)

8 reasons why it’s great to be single (lustaufsleben.at)

Salmon shrimp burger with wasabi mayonnaise and honey cucumber (gusto.at)

In the new trend: Shock-Down – how long can the economy withstand lockdowns? (Trend.at)

The 35 best family series to laugh and feel good (tv-media.at)

E-Scooter in Vienna: All providers and prices 2020 in comparison (autorevue.at)

Comments

register

Connect with Facebook

There are also friendships among royals – like that between Victoria and Mette-Marit. The Norwegian was visiting Sweden this week to give a lecture at the “EAT Conference” in Stockholm. But most of all she was looking forward to seeing her friend again.

So you can combine work with pleasure. Just recently, the two ladies went on a private outing with Victoria’s husband Daniel.